Author Archive

Evaluation toolbox: let's talk about it

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

SHOW  ME  THE  CHANGE

Complexity and the Art of Evaluation – Reporting Sheet

Leader: Damien Sweeney

Background to Toolbox:

  • Four councils involved with their project and Swinburne University is the academic partner

  • Current stage – putting tools together, have piloted some already with participating councils

  • Phone contact for case studies

  • Online forum would be useful

  • Have limitations of evaluation technique is useful

  • Qualitative is common – interview and qualitative

  • Cost benefit analysis is useful for CSIRO examples

  • Attribution – were you influenced by something else or this project? (Categorises the other influences)

  • Links to online surveys and tips to use that would be useful

  • Need to say what evaluation to have when ie. Evaluation plan for duration of project

  • City of Ballarat – project on planning and how engaged people are in programs – would be willing to pilot toolbox

  • Behaviour Change blog – through conference, could be useful to have this on site for blog

  • Survey – difficult to follow up on outcomes. Survey monkey is useful

  • Needs to be able to change the toolbox – not have it static, eg, add case studies, reviews of tools etc – make it interactive

  • Have volunteer from City of Ballarat willing to pilot the toolbox

  • Wicki page – people can add their own information and use as a blog

  • The National Social Marketing Centre in the UK is a good example of an online toolbox

  • Clear Water – storm water project

Tried and true facilitation methods

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

SHOW  ME  THE  CHANGE

Complexity and the Art of Evaluation – Reporting Sheet

Leader: Candice Bruce

Key Points:
•    Ask for input – pose a question = ownership – outcome
•    Run perpetual initiates
– normalise behaviour
•    Develop trust
–    Adaptation
–    Solution focus
–    Visuals – “in a perfect world?” Grading from 1 to 10
–    where are you now? What are the good things and the learnings? What is one thing that you can do to move forward?
•    Collective Social Learning Process – Professor Valerie Brown – “Leonardo’s Vision”
•    Spacial marking (buy special chalk to mark on carpet) – participants step in and out
•    Structured workshops
–    home work before
–    brain storming
–    objectives –  business plan
–    options
–    time frame
–    post-it notes
•    Action learning (W.I.L)
•    Getting action at the end – pair up – what I’m going to do
– follow up in 2-3 weeks – accountable
•    Never make a statement when you can ask a question
•    Two ears, one mouth – listening – hear how you are being heard.
•    Telling stories about our own journey
–    photos – pick a picture you identify with and say why
–    share with 1 other person
–    then share with the table
•    Disposable camera – photos of what are their favourite areas or their home
•    Shared Resources:
– “Estelo” specialist training supplier Sydney
– Book – Climate Action – Diesendorf
– Edward de Bono – 6 Thinking Hats
– Storms of my grandchildren – Hanson
– The Rational Manager – Kepner and Tregoe
– “Kids Teaching Kids” Aaron and Richard Wood
– MS Project – Microsoft Excel
•    Make time for individual reflection and to do visual stuff
–    Role model deliberate actions
•    Transition handbook – share slides – use art and participant centred
•    Use of PCs – SKYPE – Web Cam – interactive learning solutions
•    Conversation Tech World Café – small group, slightly different question
•    Avoid Death by PowerPoint – ½ page is read by each – feedback to group
•    Lend out lecture notes eg. Harvard – ask for question out of the lecture (day before) – get student to answer questions – 5 minute lecture
•    Participants to present chapters in book
•    Question – what is in it for them? List main outcomes – collect at beginning, everyone walks out satisfied
•    Appreciative enquiry process
•    Look for criteria – start where they are at
•    Australia Standard on Governance – transition towns: Heart, Head, Hand, grassroots, self-sustaining
•    Favourite warm up – yes, but = blocker, yes, and opens up possibilities

Turning project outcomes into reality and identifying next steps

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010
Topic: Turning project outcomes into reality –
Identifying the next steps
Leader: Zandy Tibballs
Participants: 12
Key Points:
Identify tools to use that will lead to wider uptake.  Tools such as:
Focus group work – contact primary leaders to help shape the type of information that is needed to be obtained,  > contact secondary group to determine banners and the type of information that they need to have to be willing to change.
Target specific members / leaders and tune into their radio station to identify and understand the needs of the target audience > identify pathways that the change leaders go down – what made them change, what’s needed to help others change.
Be adaptive to needs of target group audience – be willing to switch needs – identify “hook” & type of messaging to be used.
Identify & work with user groups capable of influencing the target audience group.
Pick the right champions / community leaders to help influence the target market.
Consider the use of creative evaluation, eg films, media to influence.
Utilise envisioning tools to help people identify type of future they woud like.
Make links to accreditators / certificators / cost savings / rewards / recognitors.
Undertake more independent measurement to highlight benefits and provide proof of effects that the program / products provides.
Go to where they go eg conferences that they attend and present findings.
Establish / or link “people” into a reference group where they can share information and network – “create opportunities” for target users to learn from each other.
Identify champions that the target group would value and respect.
Use formative evaluation / action research to help determine next steps.
Utilise simple marketing tools eg
1.peer review articles in relevant magazines;
2.develop fact sheets adapted from case studies, suitable for different audiences;
3.include different information for different audiences;  and
4.explain & promote the benefits / use diagrams

SHOW  ME  THE  CHANGE

Complexity and the Art of Evaluation – Reporting Sheet

Leader: Zandy Tibballs

Participants: 12

  • Identify tools to use that will lead to wider uptake.  Tools such as:
  • Focus group work – contact primary leaders to help shape the type of information that is needed to be obtained,  > contact secondary group to determine banners and the type of information that they need to have to be willing to change.
  • Target specific members / leaders and tune into their radio station to identify and understand the needs of the target audience > identify pathways that the change leaders go down – what made them change, what’s needed to help others change.
  • Be adaptive to needs of target group audience – be willing to switch needs – identify “hook” & type of messaging to be used.
  • Identify & work with user groups capable of influencing the target audience group.
  • Pick the right champions / community leaders to help influence the target market.
  • Consider the use of creative evaluation, eg films, media to influence.
  • Utilise envisioning tools to help people identify type of future they woud like.
  • Make links to accreditators / certificators / cost savings / rewards / recognitors.
  • Undertake more independent measurement to highlight benefits and provide proof of effects that the program / products provides.
  • Go to where they go eg conferences that they attend and present findings.
  • Establish / or link “people” into a reference group where they can share information and network – “create opportunities” for target users to learn from each other.
  • Identify champions that the target group would value and respect.
  • Use formative evaluation / action research to help determine next steps.
  • Utilise simple marketing tools eg
    1. peer review articles in relevant magazines;
    2. develop fact sheets adapted from case studies, suitable for different audiences;
    3. include different information for different audiences;  and
    4. explain & promote the benefits / use diagrams.

An audit and compendium of evaluation tools in current practice

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

One open space session was called to produce an inventory of evaluation tools in current practice.  The two attached files are the results of that session.  Both are in .pdf format.

If so much change occurs through word of mouth, how do we evaluate it?

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

There is general agreement that word of mouth marketing is a critical element of changing behaviour. Whether it is a family member, colleague, neighbour, or friend, we are more likely to take on the advice and behaviours that are modelled by those we trust. This is the basis of effective communication (think also of the 6 degrees of separation experiment). Mark Earls, the author of Herd: how to change mass behaviour by harnessing our true nature provides great examples of how social networks are key to changing mass behaviour.

Mark recently posted a blog about how important it is to understand social networks.

Mark notes: Social networks are not channels for advertisers or for the adverts/memes you, your clients or any of your so-called “influentials” create, social networks are for all of the people who participate in the network.

So if word of mouth is an element of your behaviour change program (as it should be), how can you track its spread, and find out whom the key people are in networks? Well, social network analysis is one way! So what is a social network analysis?

Andrew Rixon, from Babelfish Group, notes in an e-booklet on enhancing collaboration that Social Network Analysis is the technique of analysing roles and social networks…. The outcomes of social network analysis provides surprising and insightful results allowing structure(s) to become visible and discussable.

Making such networks visible should surely be one of the goals of  evaluation. In this way, for those who have read Gladwell’s Tipping Point, you can find out who the mavens, connectors and salesmen are.

Interested in finding out more on Social Network Analysis?

Andrew Rixon will be holding a post-conference workshop on this very topic, so check out the program of post conference workshops and register online.

When evaluation reinforces the status quo

Friday, April 9th, 2010

I see a lot of similarities between behaviour change interventions for sustainability and international development assistance. Both fields seek to intervene to change participants’ behaviours, and generally this is done through a linear model of cause and effect, where the intervention is evaluated as the sole agent of change. In a recent post on complexity and development, Ben Ramalingam highlights a recent publication by Olivier Serrat, Head of Knowledge Management at the Asian Development Bank:

Development is a complex, adaptive process but—with exceptions—development work has not been conducted as such… development assistance often follows a linear approach to achieving outputs and outcomes……Any planning process is based on assumptions—some will be predictable, others wishful. If the assumptions are based on invalid theories of change (including cause-and-effect relationships) and on inappropriate tools, methods, and approaches derived from those, development agencies jeopardize the impacts they seek to realize.

In terms of evaluation, the risk is not solely that we jeopardise the impacts, but that we choose evaluation methods that will seek out what we want to show, whether this has actually occurred or not. If we are intent on showing a particular change, it is quite easy to (inadvertently or not) seek out what we (want to) believe actually happened, and by doing this we reinforce the perpetuation of behaviour change interventions that may not be all that successful. And in doing this we reinforce the status quo, rather than move towards better practices that account for complexity.

Here’s a nice quote from Aaron Levenstein to keep in mind:
Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.

Who else do you want to see at Show me the Change?

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

The conference has already attracted a great number of participants from a wide variety of backgrounds. And as this conference is not one where “experts” will be doing all the “talking to you”, the diversity of people will make for passionate and thought-provoking conversations.

If you have already registered, who else do you know who has something to share or someting to learn from this conference? Why not let them know that you’ll be there, and that you would value their participation and exchange of ideas.  You can download a conference e-card from here, which you can use to email those whom you think should also attend.

Download the conference e-card

Download the conference e-card

The more things change, the more they stay the same

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

This phrase, from the original in French “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” is very pertinent in our quest to change behaviours.

In a WWF report, Crompton (2008: 5) states: “The results of experiments examining the ‘foot-in-the-door’ approach (the hope that individuals can be led up a virtuous ladder of ever more far-reaching behavioural changes) are fraught with contradictions”.

What does this mean in terms of evaluation? Well, for one, self-reporting of changes may lead to socially-desirable answers that overestimate the amount of actual change.

So how do we undertake better evaluations? Well, hopefully this will all be revealed in the conversations that take place at Show me the Change. Which leads me to the following…………

The Abbotsford Declaration on Behaviour Change Evaluation


A recent post on Rick Davies Evaluation News Site on the Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness made me think about what we can collectively achieve from Show me the Change.

Based on the diversity of people attending I am sure that the conversations will be passionate and inspiring and the amount of knowledge exchange based on practical experiences will lead to better practices…. So how about working towards an Abbotsford Declaration on Behaviour Change Evaluation as a marker for this event, and as a building block for future behaviour change programs and their evaluation!

How expectations shape behaviour

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

In this interesting study on how other people’s expectations shape us, the researchers found that other people’s expectations about us directly affect how we behave.

Understanding that other people’s expectations about us directly and immediately affect our behaviour is a vital component in understanding how we can come to be quite different people across various social situations.

I leave you with one final thought: in the real world two people are influencing each other continuously, trying to live up (or down) to each other’s expectations. Of course we only have direct control over our own expectations of others, so one implication of this study is that by changing our expectations of others we can actually change their behaviour for worse or, should we choose, for the better.

The effect may be subtle, but it’s a powerful realisation that other people’s behaviour is partly derived from how we view them, just as our behaviour is partly derived from how others view us.

I wonder what role our expectations of people involved in behaviour change programs affects the outcomes?

Viv

Overcoming existing evaluation cultures and processes

Monday, March 29th, 2010

A post on evaluation and complexity on Rick Davies monitoring and evaluation news site has a link to a great powerpoint on evaluation and the science of complexity by Ben Ramalingam. Ben notes that for many organisations, evaluations are at the centre of a vicious circle that includes pressure to show results and impacts, and poor learning and accountability amongst others.

Further, Ben notes that “Evaluations are still largely focused on reports as opposed to changed behaviours, ways of thinking and attitudes”. This seems very true, and I am sure many of us would recollect knowing of reports that have been produced for the report’s sake, and not what is in it.

A nice slide from Ben Ramalingam's powerpoint

Image source: http://www.outcomemapping.ca/resource/resource.php?id=183


The image, taken from one of Ben’s slides, encapsulates well the idea that existing process and culture can overshadow the ability to undertake more effective evaluation.

In another post, Ben notes “Some of the issues for evaluation include the tension between learning and accountability, the limits of attribution, how evaluations are or are not used, equality and power, and ideological debates about methodologies, such as the dominance of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)……Although there is a wealth of evaluation methods in theory, in practice they are largely required to conform to scientific management principles……..In contrast, complexity theory (theories) talks about systems that are interconnected, driven by feedback, where the properties of the system are not predictable but emerge from the relationships within that system……..It may be that we need to stop focusing on projects, and look more broadly at the societies that we work in and across sectors and institutions rather than within them. Evaluations may need to be more centred on real-time learning and helping managers adapt what they do.”

This is what Show me the Change is about- discussing how as a community of practice we can overcome the real or imagined culture that can negatively impact on more novel, experimental, and altogether better evaluation practice and processes.

So if you are interested in evaluation, behaviour change and sustainability in a complex workd, take part in the conversations that matter, on 4-6 May in Melbourne.